# Fs\_lvm now is working! Changed type of datastore 100 to system\_ds

**URL:** <https://forum.opennebula.io/t/fs-lvm-now-is-working-changed-type-of-datastore-100-to-system-ds/5065>\
**Category:** Product Support\
**Created:** [October 9, 2017, 11:59am UTC](https://forum.opennebula.io/t/fs-lvm-now-is-working-changed-type-of-datastore-100-to-system-ds/5065 "2017-10-09T11:59:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Webhuis](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.opennebula.io/webhuis/32/5412_2.png) [@Webhuis](https://forum.opennebula.io/u/Webhuis)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2017, 11:59am UTC](https://forum.opennebula.io/t/fs-lvm-now-is-working-changed-type-of-datastore-100-to-system-ds/5065/1 "2017-10-09T11:59:13Z")

</div>

Hi,  
It may not be the way to go to have storage on physical hosts, but that is the situation I have here today.  
I am struggling to get Opennebula to work with a shared storage. We do not have a high end San, so I want to use the disks of the physical machines.  
I added the host to the configuration, but the storage (3T) is not shown.

I am trying to set it up like this.  
[http://docs.opennebula.org/4.14/administration/storage/fs\_lvm\_ds.html](http://docs.opennebula.org/4.14/administration/storage/fs_lvm_ds.html)  
It says id 0 system and 1 default should be shared. I changed /etc/oned.conf and changed shared=no to yes.  
ID NAME SIZE AVAIL CLUSTERS IMAGES TYPE DS TM STAT  
0 system 121.3G 93% 0 0 sys - fs\_lvm on  
1 default 121.3G 93% 0 2 img fs ssh on  
2 files 121.3G 93% 0 0 fil fs ssh on  
100 production 14.5G 82% 0 0 img fs fs\_lvm on  
I tried onedatastore update 0 system\_ds\_0.conf  
oneadmin@oneadmpren01:~$ cat system\_ds\_0.conf  
ALLOW\_ORPHANS=NO  
DISK\_TYPE=FILE  
DS\_MIGRATE=YES  
RESTRICTED\_DIRS=/  
SAFE\_DIRS=/var/tmp  
SHARED=YES  
TM\_MAD=fs\_lvm  
TYPE=SYSTEM\_DS  
#DISK\_TYPE=block  
But still not shared

Where did I go wrong?

Kind regards,  
Martin.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marcindulak](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a3d4f5/32.png) [@marcindulak](https://forum.opennebula.io/u/marcindulak)\
**Post date:** [October 12, 2017, 7:26pm UTC](https://forum.opennebula.io/t/fs-lvm-now-is-working-changed-type-of-datastore-100-to-system-ds/5065/2 "2017-10-12T19:26:31Z")

</div>

The guide you mention assumes clvm. The simplest options is to use nfs, documented in the old quick start guides  
[http://docs.opennebula.org/4.14/design\_and\_installation/quick\_starts/qs\_ubuntu\_kvm.html](http://docs.opennebula.org/4.14/design_and_installation/quick_starts/qs_ubuntu_kvm.html)  
and in case of debugging needed see [Unable to instanciate VM on a fresh installed system](https://forum.opennebula.io/t/unable-to-instanciate-vm-on-a-fresh-installed-system/4929)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Webhuis](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.opennebula.io/webhuis/32/5412_2.png) [@Webhuis](https://forum.opennebula.io/u/Webhuis)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2017, 12:29pm UTC](https://forum.opennebula.io/t/fs-lvm-now-is-working-changed-type-of-datastore-100-to-system-ds/5065/3 "2017-10-13T12:29:51Z")

</div>

Dear Marc,  
Thank you, it is useful to consider nfs, a beauty of a protocol.  
I now have it working with ssh, nfs is not an option within our security minded management.  
Kind regards,  
Martin.
