Question about Bridged Networks

alessandro.caetano · May 11, 2021, 7:27pm

Hello, I have a cluster with two nodes, one master node containing all OpenNebula services that’s also configured as a KVM node, and another machine containing only the KVM services. I’m in doubt when configuring the network services for both nodes. In the Master node I have two network interfaces, In one of them a set-up a bridge called nebula0 as show here:

1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master nebula0 state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether f4:8e:38:e0:41:79 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether f4:8e:38:e0:41:7a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 10.2.250.14/24 brd 10.2.250.255 scope global noprefixroute eno2
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::f68e:38ff:fee0:417a/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
4: nebula0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether f4:8e:38:e0:41:79 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 10.2.250.13/24 brd 10.2.250.255 scope global noprefixroute nebula0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::f68e:38ff:fee0:4179/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
5: virbr0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 52:54:00:d0:cf:c6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.122.1/24 brd 192.168.122.255 scope global virbr0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

In the other node, called NODE1, I didn’t make any network configuration so its interfaces are:

1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 84:7b:eb:e4:f4:32 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 10.2.250.22/24 brd 10.2.250.255 scope global dynamic eno1
       valid_lft 69466sec preferred_lft 69466sec
    inet6 fe80::867b:ebff:fee4:f432/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: virbr0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 52:54:00:0a:81:63 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.122.1/24 brd 192.168.122.255 scope global virbr0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
4: virbr0-nic: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel master virbr0 state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 52:54:00:0a:81:63 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

I’ve created one VNET using Sunstone, that is configured as follows?

root@NEBULACLUSTER-MASTER-MACAE-ED-COMPANY:/etc/netplan# onevnet list
  ID USER     GROUP    NAME                                                                                                                                      CLUSTERS   BRIDGE                                                                    LEASES
   9 alessand oneadmin Private VNET                                                                                                                              100        nebula0                                                                        2
root@NEBULACLUSTER-MASTER-MACAE-ED-COMPANY:/etc/netplan# onevnet show 9
VIRTUAL NETWORK 9 INFORMATION
ID                       : 9
NAME                     : Private VNET
USER                     : alessandro.caetano
GROUP                    : oneadmin
LOCK                     : None
CLUSTERS                 : 100
BRIDGE                   : nebula0
VN_MAD                   : bridge
PHYSICAL DEVICE          : eno1
AUTOMATIC VLAN ID        : NO
AUTOMATIC OUTER VLAN ID  : NO
USED LEASES              : 2

PERMISSIONS
OWNER                    : um-
GROUP                    : ---
OTHER                    : ---

VIRTUAL NETWORK TEMPLATE
BRIDGE="nebula0"
BRIDGE_TYPE="linux"
DNS="10.2.250.1"
GATEWAY="10.2.250.1"
GUEST_MTU="1500"
NETWORK_ADDRESS="10.2.250.13"
NETWORK_MASK="255.255.255.0"
PHYDEV="eno1"
SECURITY_GROUPS="0"
VN_MAD="bridge"

ADDRESS RANGE POOL
AR 0
SIZE           : 100
LEASES         : 2

RANGE                                   FIRST                               LAST
MAC                         02:00:0a:02:fa:64                  02:00:0a:02:fa:c7
IP                               10.2.250.100                       10.2.250.199


LEASES
AR  OWNER                         MAC              IP                        IP6
0   V:38            02:00:0a:02:fa:64    10.2.250.100                          -
0   V:39            02:00:0a:02:fa:65    10.2.250.101                          -

VIRTUAL ROUTERS

Whenever I create a VM in the Master node, the VM has internet connectivity, however, when the VM is in the Node1, it doesn’t. Do I need to create the same bridge in all the nodes that I add to the OpenNebula cluster, if so what’s the point of selecting a bridged network instead of a dummy VM_MAD?

Versions of the related components and OS (frontend, hypervisors, VMs):
OpenNebula

ii  opennebula                             6.0.0.1-1.ce                          amd64        OpenNebula Server and Scheduler (Community Edition)
ii  opennebula-common                      6.0.0.1-1.ce                          all          Common OpenNebula package shared by various components (Community Edition)
ii  opennebula-common-onecfg               6.0.0.1-1.ce                          all          Helpers for OpenNebula onecfg (Community Edition)
ii  opennebula-fireedge                    6.0.0.1-1.ce                          amd64        OpenNebula web interface FireEdge (Community Edition)
ii  opennebula-flow                        6.0.0.1-1.ce                          all          OpenNebula Flow server (Community Edition)
ii  opennebula-gate                        6.0.0.1-1.ce                          all          OpenNebula Gate server (Community Edition)
ii  opennebula-guacd                       6.0.0.1-1.ce                          amd64        Provides Guacamole server for Fireedge to be used in Sunstone (Community Edition)
ii  opennebula-libs                        6.0.0.1-1.ce                          all          OpenNebula libraries (Community Edition)
ii  opennebula-node-kvm                    6.0.0.1-1.ce                          all          Services for OpenNebula KVM node (Community Edition)
ii  opennebula-provision                   6.0.0.1-1.ce                          all          OpenNebula infrastructure provisioning (Community Edition)
ii  opennebula-provision-data              6.0.0.1-1.ce                          all          OpenNebula infrastructure provisioning data (Community Edition)
ii  opennebula-rubygems                    6.0.0.1-1.ce                          all          Ruby dependencies for OpenNebula (Community Edition)
ii  opennebula-sunstone                    6.0.0.1-1.ce                          all          OpenNebula web interface Sunstone (Community Edition)
ii  opennebula-tools                       6.0.0.1-1.ce                          all          OpenNebula command line tools (Community Edition)

Master Node Services

  opennebula-fireedge.service                                                              loaded active running   OpenNebula FireEdge Server
  opennebula-flow.service                                                                  loaded active running   OpenNebula Flow Service
  opennebula-gate.service                                                                  loaded active running   OpenNebula Gate Service
  opennebula-guacd.service                                                                 loaded active running   OpenNebula Guacamole Server
  opennebula-hem.service                                                                   loaded active running   OpenNebula Hook Execution Service
  opennebula-novnc.service                                                                 loaded active running   OpenNebula noVNC Server
  opennebula-scheduler.service                                                             loaded active running   OpenNebula Cloud Scheduler Daemon
  opennebula-ssh-agent.service                                                             loaded active running   OpenNebula SSH agent
  opennebula-sunstone.service                                                              loaded active running   OpenNebula Web UI Server
  opennebula.service                                                                       loaded active running   OpenNebula Cloud Controller Daemon
  opennebula-showback.timer                                                                loaded active waiting   OpenNebula's periodic showback calculation
  opennebula-ssh-socks-cleaner.timer                                                       loaded active waiting   OpenNebula SSH persistent connection cleaner

Master Node

No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:    Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS
Release:        20.04
Codename:       focal

Node 1

No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:    Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS
Release:        20.04
Codename:       focal

rdiaz · May 12, 2021, 7:11am

Hi @alessandro.caetano,

Driver bridge will be in charge of configuring the Linux bridge if not present when a VM is instantiated on a host. However, you’ll be in charge of configuring the routing in case you want to have Internet access in VMs.

Cheers.

alessandro.caetano · May 12, 2021, 12:31pm

Hello @rdiaz ,

Are there any good tutorials on how to do that?

feldsam · May 12, 2021, 8:10pm

Hello, hard help you, if we don’t know your netowrk topology. Looks like you have router/gateway with NAT and you need to setup network for VMs to access this gateway to get internet access

alessandro.caetano · May 22, 2021, 12:23am

It was easier for me to configure bridges manually in the hosts, I still don’t know the usability of the driver bridge if it’s for me to manually create routes.

Topic		Replies	Views
Trying to understand a SDN "virtual private network" Community Support	3	534	November 11, 2022
Network problem connecting from other hosts Community Support	2	1398	October 3, 2017
Clarifying terms of virtual networks - using kvm Community Support	2	2484	August 12, 2015
SDN and network traffic Community Support	0	286	October 8, 2019
OpenNebula attach VM to hypervisor physical network interface Network	4	936	February 12, 2020

Question about Bridged Networks

Related Topics